QA Mentor, Inc.

visit site

QA Mentor, Inc. Is a midsize Application Testing company. The New York, New York-based agency was founded in 2010. Their team provides Application Testing.

Client Insights

Industry Expertise

Business services

25%

Financial services

25%

Other industries

25%

eCommerce

25%

Client Size Distribution

Small Business (<$10M) 70%

Midmarket ($10M - $1B) 25%

Enterprise (>$1B) 5%

Common Project Size

<$10K 3 projects

$200K-$999K 2 projects

$10,000,000m+ 1 project

Clients

  • HSBC

Highlights from Recent Projects

Overall Rating

4.9
7 Reviews

QA Mentor, Inc. was hired by ALICE, a hospitality technology company, to execute manual software regression tests. The goal was to alleviate the burden of these tests from the internal staff while maintaining the quality of software releases. QA Mentor was selected for their cost, quality of staff, and their flexible staffing model. Initially, the QA Mentor team worked closely with ALICE to understand the tests and the product. In subsequent cycles, QA Mentor has been mostly independent, except when new test suites are added. The team provided by QA Mentor consists of 10 members who successfully completed the test cycle within the required time frame.

QA Mentor, Inc. was engaged by a music data analytics startup to conduct regression testing of existing features and testing new features of their web application. The aim was to catch bugs before customers see them and alleviate responsibilities on the development team. The vendor was chosen through a connection on LinkedIn and a subsequent discussion about the process and contract terms. QA Mentor used Trello for task management and bug tracking and communicated via Slack for queries about the product. The team composition for this project was one black box tester.

Cie, a web development company, hired QA Mentor, Inc. for on-demand QA services. The goal was to get adequate support for their QA needs when they needed more resources. QA Mentor was selected based on their excellent reputation and competitive rates. The services they provided varied depending on the project, ranging from small to large-scale projects, for both websites and mobile apps. The team composition also varied from just a developer and a QA resource to a whole team of developers and QAs, depending on the project's requirements.

Timeliness

4.6

Service Excellence

4.8

Value

4.9

Would Recommend

4.9