Calcey Technologies

visit site
Calcey Technologies is a custom software development firm launched in 2002. They are headquartered in Colombo, Sri Lanka and Las Vegas, Nevada and have a midsize team. The firm specializes in Custom Software Development, UX/UI Design, BI & big data consulting & SI, Web Development, and more.

Client Insights

Industry Expertise

Information technology

40%

Financial services

10%

Medical

10%

Other industries

10%

Retail

10%

eCommerce

10%

Education

5%

Real estate

5%

Client Size Distribution

Small Business (<$10M) 70%

Midmarket ($10M - $1B) 25%

Enterprise (>$1B) 5%

Common Project Size

$50K-$199K 2 projects

$10K-$49K 1 project

Clients

This provider has not added their key clients.

Highlights from Recent Projects

Overall Rating

3.5
3 Reviews

Calcey Technologies was enlisted by a global real estate company to provide additional resources for QA and web application development. The company, which had a medium-sized team in San Francisco, had previously developed various applications in-house. However, they lacked in-house QA resources and sought the expertise of Calcey. After a straightforward recruitment process, Calcey performed an assessment and provided a cost-effective and resourceful recommendation. The client appreciated Calcey's commitment to process and competitive pricing, which led to their selection over other global agencies.

In a separate project, Calcey Technologies provided development and QA services for the Wikimedia Foundation. The Foundation's Head of User Experience was seeking a team to go through several exploration, development, QA, and release cycles in over 250 languages within a year. Calcey was selected after multiple vendor evaluations, with a team of three, including a project manager, a developer, and a QA specialist, collaborating closely with the Foundation. The client highlighted Calcey's critical role in the development and QA stages, helping to successfully deliver the relevant features.

Timeliness

3.5

Service Excellence

3.5

Value

3.2

Would Recommend

3.5